TheZyberSecurity home
ISO 42001

ISO/IEC 42001 Readiness

End-to-end ISO/IEC 42001:2023 readiness — the first international standard for AI Management Systems (AIMS).

Outcome
The AI-management system regulators want to see.
Timeline
4 phases3–4 weeks · 6–8 weeks · 3–5 months · 3 weeks
Mapped to
ISO/IECNIST · EU AI Act
Includes
Readout + retestFixed criticals and highs re-verified.
Is this for you?

Know before you book.

We help you set up the AI management system in ISO/IEC 42001, so your AI is governed, documented and ready for certification.

You likely need this if
  • You build or deploy AI and customers ask how it's governed
  • You're exposed to the EU AI Act or similar rules
  • You want AI risk and impact assessments that stand up to scrutiny
  • You already have ISO 27001 and want to extend it to AI
Something else may fit better
What to have ready
  • An inventory of AI systems and models in use
  • Data sources and third-party AI providers
  • An owner for AI governance

Still not sure? Take the 2-minute check

What you walk away with.

  • AIMS scope statement + AI-system inventory
  • AI Impact Assessments (AIA) per ISO 42005 methodology
  • Full control set (Annex A + B) implementation guidance
  • Internal Audit + Management Review pack, certification-body-ready
Scope

What we cover

Agreed in writing before testing starts.

In scope
  • Full 2023 Annex A control set + Annex B implementation guidance
  • Clauses 4–10: Context through Improvement (mirrors ISO 27001 structure)
  • AI-system inventory + role classification (provider / user / relevant party)
  • AI Impact Assessments (AIA) — the operational heart of ISO 42001
  • Data governance for AI — training, evaluation, deployment datasets
  • Third-party AI risk (foundation-model vendors, MLOps platforms)
Not in this engagement
  • EU AI Act certification directly (we support alignment; conformity assessment is a separate regime)
Approach

How we run it.

  1. 01

    AIMS scoping

    Which AI systems? Which roles do you play — provider, user, distributor, importer? Which jurisdictions?

  2. 02

    System inventory

    Every model in production, staging, and shadow. Row per system: lifecycle stage, risk classification, owner.

  3. 03

    Impact assessments

    An AIA per system — intended use, unintended use, impacted parties, mitigation. ISO 42005 methodology.

  4. 04

    Control implementation

    Annex A controls implemented with your ML/AI teams. Governance that ships, not governance that prints.

  5. 05

    Internal audit + review

    Clause 9.2 internal audit executed, Management Review packet delivered.

For practitioners

Technical detail.

The depth behind the engagement, for the engineer or CISO evaluating us.

Standard
  • ISO/IEC 42001:2023 clauses 4–10
  • Annex A AI controls
  • Statement of Applicability for AI
Assessments
  • AI risk assessment
  • AI system impact assessment
  • Data quality and provenance controls
Alignment
  • NIST AI RMF 1.0
  • EU AI Act obligations mapping
  • Integration with an existing ISO 27001 ISMS
Output
  • AIMS documentation set
  • Internal audit and management review
  • Certification-audit evidence pack
Deliverables

What lands in your inbox.

  • AIMS Scope Statement + AI-System Inventory
  • AI Impact Assessments (one per in-scope system)
  • Statement of Applicability (Annex A)
  • Data & Model Governance policies + records
  • Internal Audit Report + Management Review packet
Standards mapping

Defensible under audit.

ISO/IEC
42001:202342005:2025 (AIA)23894:2023 (AI Risk)5338:2023 (AI SDLC)
NIST
AI RMF 1.0AI RMF Generative AI Profile
EU AI Act
Alignment mapping for high-risk systems
Timeline

From call to report.

  1. 01Gap analysis + scoping

    3–4 weeks

  2. 02AIMS design + AIA programme

    6–8 weeks

  3. 03Control implementation support

    3–5 months

  4. 04Internal audit + review

    3 weeks

Questions

Asked before every engagement.

Do we need ISO 27001 first?

Not required, but strongly recommended. ISO 42001 mirrors 27001's structure — running them as one integrated management system is the efficient path.

How does this relate to the EU AI Act?

ISO 42001 isn't the AI Act, but it's the recognized baseline regulators cite. A certified AIMS materially reduces your AI Act conformity-assessment burden for high-risk systems.

Can you run this alongside an AI Pen Test engagement?

Yes. AI Penetration Testing produces evidence that plugs directly into ISO 42001 impact-assessment and data/resource controls.

Start here

Ship AI with governance regulators trust.

Scoping call, program plan within 2 weeks, first internal audit inside 6 months for focused scopes.

Day 0Scoping callWe learn your systems, deadlines and what “done” looks like.
Within 5 business daysFixed scope & priceA written engagement letter. No surprises later.
Within 2 weeksTesting startsCritical findings reach you within 24 hours of confirmation.